Showing posts with label PRGN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PRGN. Show all posts

02 March 2011

PRGN: Income Statement Analysis for the December 2010 Quarter

Paragon Shipping, Inc., (NYSE: PRGN) earned $0.04 per diluted share on a GAAP basis in the December-ending fourth quarter of 2010, down more than 80 percent from $0.26 in the same three months of the previous year.

Adjusted earnings, a non-GAAP measure that excludes various non-cash items, sank from $0.17 to $0.08 per share in the fourth quarter.

This post reviews Paragon Shipping's Income Statement for the quarter.  We did not issue any advance estimates of the results.  The principal sources for the analysis were the earnings announcement and the accompanying slide presentation.

In a second article, we will provide updated figures for the financial metrics we use to analyze Cash Management, Growth, Profitability and Value.


Before getting into the details, we will take a step back to introduce the subject of today's analysis.

Paragon Shipping owns and charters ships that carry dry bulk cargoes and, now, containers.  The company is headquartered in Greece and has been operating since December 2006.  Paragon generally seeks to secure one-to-five year, fixed-rate charters for its vessels; this strategy dampens the effect of industry volatility on the company.  Paragon has already secured charters for 98 percent of its fleet capacity in 2011.

15 November 2010

PRGN: Income Statement Analysis for the September 2010 Quarter

Paragon Shipping, Inc., (NYSE: PRGN) earned $0.08 per diluted share on a GAAP basis in the September-ending third quarter of 2010, down almost 80 percent from $0.40 in the same three months of last year.

Adjusted earnings per share, a non-GAAP measure that excludes various non-cash items, sank from $0.33 to $0.17.

This post reviews Paragon's Income Statement for the quarter.  We did not issue any estimates in advance of the actual results being released.  The principal sources for the analysis were the earnings announcement and management's published discussion and analysis.

In a second article, we will provide updated figures for the financial metrics we use to analyze Cash Management, Growth, Profitability and Value.


Before getting into the details, we will take a step back to introduce the subject of today's analysis.

Paragon Shipping owns and charters ships that carry dry bulk cargoes and, now, containers.  The company is headquartered in Greece and has been operating since December 2006.  Paragon generally seeks to secure one-to-five year, fixed-rate charters for its vessels; this strategy dampens the effect of industry volatility on the company.  Paragon has already secured charters for 98 percent of its fleet capacity in 2011.

10 August 2010

PRGN: Income Statement Analysis for the June 2010 Quarter

Paragon Shipping, Inc., (NYSE: PRGN) earned $0.14 to $0.15 per diluted share, on a GAAP basis, in 2010's second quarter, which ended 30 June.  Earnings per share were less than one third of the $0.48 Paragon made in the same quarter of 2009.

Adjusted earnings per share, a non-GAAP measure that excludes various non-cash items, sank from $0.51 to $0.13.

A 50-percent increase in the weighted average number of diluted Class A common shares made the EPS decline steeper than the change in Net Income.  Equity offerings in 2009 expanded the share count.

This post reviews Paragon's Income Statement for the quarter.  We did not issue any estimates in advance of the actual results being released.  The principal sources for the analysis were the earnings announcement and the conference call presentation [pdf].

In a second article, we will provide updated figures for the financial metrics we use to analyze Cash Management, Growth, Profitability and Value.


Before getting into the details, we will take a step back to introduce the subject of today's analysis.

26 May 2010

PRGN: Financial Gauge Analysis for the March 2010 Quarter

Paragon Shipping, Inc., (NYSE: PRGN) earned $0.185 per share on a GAAP basis in 2010's first quarter, which ended on 31 March 2010.  Reported earnings per share were 74 percent less than the $0.71 Paragon made in 2009's first quarter. 

Adjusted Net Income, which excludes various non-cash items, fell from $0.54 per share to $0.16.  An 83-percent increase in the weighted average number of diluted Class A common shares steepened the per-share declines.

We previously reviewed Paragon's Income Statement for the quarter in some detail.

We have now updated the various financial metrics we use to analyze Cash Management, Growth, Profitability and Value.  This post reports on the metrics for Paragon Shipping, which were calculated using data from Paragon's current and historical financial statements, including the latest formal submission for the March 2010 quarter.

Paragon does not have a long enough financial record for us to calculate meaningful financial gauge scores.


Paragon Shipping owns and charters ships that carry dry bulk cargoes.  The company is headquartered in Greece and has been operating since December 2006.  Paragon generally seeks to secure one-to-five year, fixed-rate charters for its vessels; this strategy dampens the effect of industry volatility on the company.  In 2010, charter arrangements have been made for all vessels throughout the year.

The Baltic Dry index of shipping rates, shown in the diagram below from StockCharts.com, plunged in 2009.  The index has been slowly recovering, with a few fits and starts, during the last 18 months.

04 May 2010

PRGN: Income Statement Analysis for the March 2010 Quarter

Paragon Shipping, Inc., (NYSE: PRGN) earned $0.185 per share, on a GAAP basis, in the first quarter of 2010.  This amount is 74 percent less than the $0.71 per share Paragon made in 2009's first quarter. 

Adjusted Net Income, a non-GAAP measure that excludes various non-cash items, fell from $14.7 million to $8.1 million.  Adjusted earnings per share dropped from $0.54 to $0.16.

An 83-percent increase in the weighted average number of diluted Class A common shares steepened the EPS decline.  The share-count rise resulted from 2009's equity offerings.


This post reviews Paragon's Income Statement for the quarter.  We did not issue any estimates in advance of the actual results being released.  The principal sources for the analysis were the earnings announcement and the conference call presentation [pdf].

In a second article, we will provide updated figures for the financial metrics we use to analyze Cash Management, Growth, Profitability and Value.

Paragon Shipping owns and charters ships that carry dry bulk cargoes.  The company is headquartered in Greece and has been operating since December 2006.  Paragon generally seeks to secure one-to-five year, fixed-rate charters for its vessels; this strategy dampens the effect of industry volatility on the company.  In 2010, charter arrangements have been made for all vessels throughout the year.

Please click here to see a full-sized, normalized depiction of the actual results for the just-concluded quarter, as well as the quarterly Income Statements for the last couple of years.  Please note that our organization of revenues, expenses, gains, and losses, which we use for all analyses, can and often does differ in material respects from company-used formats.  The standardization facilitates cross-company comparisons.

27 February 2010

PRGN: Income Statement Analysis for the December 2009 Quarter

Paragon Shipping, Inc., (NASDAQ: PRGN) earned $0.26 per share, on a GAAP basis, in the fourth quarter of 2009, which ended on 31 December 2009.  When compared to the fourth quarter of 2008, Net Income increased by 27.6 percent, and the weighted average number of diluted Class A shares grew by 75.9 percent.  As a result, GAAP earnings per share fell close to 30 percent.

Non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income, which excludes certain non-cash items, fell 38.9 percent and Adjusted EPS slid 67.3 percent.

This post reviews Paragon's Income Statement for the quarter.  The principal sources for the analysis were the earnings announcement and the conference call presentation [pdf].
 
In a second article, we will provide updated figures for the financial metrics we use to analyze Cash Management, Growth, Profitability and Value.

18 January 2010

PRGN: Prospectus Supplement

The insightful Footnoted.org has observed that some companies submit interesting regulatory filings with the SEC late on Fridays, especially before a holiday weekend.

We had this thought in mind as we perused the Form F-3, Registration statement by foreign private issuers, that the SEC accepted from Paragon Shipping, Inc., (NASDAQ: PRGN) on Friday, 15 January 2010, at 4:33 PM.  The F-3 provides a preliminary supplement to the company's shelf-registration prospectus.

03 December 2009

PRGN: Financial Gauge Analysis for the September 2009 Quarter

In a previous article, we examined Paragon Shipping's (NASDAQ: PRGN) Income Statement for the third quarter of 2009.  Earnings in this period, which ended on 30 September, fell from $0.59 to $0.40 per share.  The average number of shares outstanding increased by 64 percent, relative to the same quarter of last year, as a consequence of two dilutive equity offerings earlier this year.

Using the financial statements in the earnings announcement and the separately issued Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results, we have now updated our usual set of Cash Management, Growth, Profitability and Value metrics.  Paragon does not have a long enough financial record for us to calculate meaningful financial gauge scores.

21 November 2009

PRGN: Income Statement Analysis for the September 2009 Quarter

Paragon Shipping, Inc., (NASDAQ: PRGN) earned $0.40 per share in the third quarter of 2009, down from $0.69 in the same quarter of last year.  The steepness of the earnings-per-share decline was more due to the 64-percent increase in the weighted average number of diluted shares, after two equity offerings, than the 4.9-percent decrease in Net Income.

This post reviews each row of the Income Statement for the quarter in the earnings announcement.  We also consulted the separately issued Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results.

We did not issue a "look-ahead" estimate in advance of the earnings release.

In a second article, we will report Paragon's scores as measured by the GCFR financial gauges. The follow-up post will also provide the latest figures for the various financial metrics we use to analyze Cash Management, Growth, Profitability and Value.

01 September 2009

PRGN: Financial Gauge Analysis for the June 2009 Quarter

In an earlier post, we examined Paragon Shipping's (NASDAQ: PRGN) Income Statement for the June quarter.  Earnings in this period, the second quarter of 2009, fell from $0.91 to $0.48 per share.  Net income excluding various items increased from $0.49 to $0.51 per share.

We have since mined the financial statements in Paragon's earnings announcement and the separately released Management's Discussion and Analysis to update the metrics we use to assess Cash Management, Growth, Profitability and Value.  Paragon does not have a long enough financial record for us to calculate meaningful Financial Gauge scores.



13 August 2009

PRGN: Income Statement Analysis for the June 2009 Quarter

Paragon Shipping, Inc., (NASDAQ: PRGN) earned $0.48 per share in the three months that ended on 30 June 2009, down from $0.91 in the second quarter of last year.  The company trumpets that net income adjusted to exclude various non-cash items increased from $0.49 to $0.51 per share.

Headquartered in Greece and operating since December 2006, Paragon owns and charters ships that carry dry bulk cargoes.  Chairman and CEO Michael Bodouroglou also controls the company, Allseas Marine S.A., that Paragon pays to manage its fleet.

This post examines the Income Statement for the quarter.  We did not issue a "look-ahead" estimate in advance of the earnings release.

In a second article, we will provide the latest figures for the financial metrics we use to analyze Cash Management, Growth, Profitability and Value.

Our sources were the earnings announcement and the separately released Management's Discussion and Analysis.

Pleas
e click here to see a full-sized, normalized depiction of the actual and projected results for the just-concluded quarter, as well as the quarterly Income Statements for the last couple of years.  Please note that our organization of revenues, expenses, gains, and losses, which we use for all analyses, can and often does differ in material respects from company-used formats.  The standardization facilitates cross-company comparisons.






Revenue (after commissions totaling 5.2 percent) in the June 2009 quarter was 3.7 percent greater than in the second quarter of 2008.  The average daily revenue per vessel (time charter equivalent) fell 5.6 percent, but Paragon operated one more vessel in the recent period.

We group the Voyage expenses, Vessel operating expenses, and Dry-docking expenses reported by Paragon, and we call the result the Cost of Goods Sold.  CGS was 12.3 percent of Revenue, which translates into a Gross Margin of 87.7 percent, in the June 2009 quarter.  The Gross Margin was 85.7 percent in last year's second quarter. 

The improved Gross Margin was largely due to a reduction in Dry-docking expenses.  This cost was cut from $510 thousand, which was used last year for dry docking of two vessels, to only $25 thousand.  Vessels this year were inspected in lieu of dry docking.

Because the Paragon owned an additional vessel in 2009, Depreciation expenses rose from 20.3 percent of Revenue last year to 21.6 percent.

Sales, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses, in which we include management fees, were 4.7 percent of Revenue.  These expenses were 6.5 percent of Revenue last year. 

The management fee was $746 per day per vessel in the second quarter, plus reimbursements for legal, accounting, and financial services.

G&A costs were cut from $1.6 million to $1.0 million.

Paragon recorded an asset impairment charge of $6 million on one vessel, the Handymax bulk carrier MV Blue Seas, which will be sold for $17.55 million (less a 3 percent commission) later this year.   The Blue Seas must have been carried on Paragon's books for $23.9 million prior to the (25 percent, give or take) impairment charge. 

No other vessel in the fleet was deemed impaired by Paragon, but it would be reasonable to suspect a general decline in valuations.

The impairment charge was the main reason Operating Income fell 17 percent to $18.9 million.  Excluding the charge, Operating Income would have risen about 8 percent. 

Other expenses of $3 million brought Net Income to $15.8 million ($0.48 per share), compared to $24.6 million ($0.91 per share).

Paragon paid no income taxes in either period.



Full disclosure: Long PRGN at time of writing.

12 June 2009

PRGN: Liquidity and Share Offerings

In May, we analyzed the first-quarter 2009 results of Paragon Shipping, Inc., (NASDAQ: PRGN).  Paragon, which has its headquarters in Voula, Greece, owns ships that carry dry bulk cargoes.

The downturn in global trade has caused shipping rates, such as those tracked by the Baltic Dry Index, to collapse.  Not surprisingly, lower rates have also reduced the value of the vessels themselves. 

Nevertheless, Paragon's first-quarter earnings exceeded market expectations, and the price of the company's shares soared in response.  Mesmerized by the good news, we didn't give Paragon's credit situation enough attention.  We have since decided the matter was worth a second look. 

Paragon, in regulatory filings, has discussed liquidity and actions to improve it.  We constructed the following summary from the various documents the company submitted to the SEC. 


There might have been earlier indications, but Paragon's announcement on 18 March 2009 of its results for the fourth quarter of 2008 contained the first inkling of a concern we could find. 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Michael Bodouroglou commented:

“In addition, we amended our six credit facilities that will be in effect through December 31, 2009 and on terms that allow Paragon to maintain its high level of liquidity.”

Mr. Bodouroglou announced that the company had decided to reduce its quarterly dividend from $0.50 to $0.05 per share.  He also stated:

"While we believe 2009 will be a challenging year for the drybulk market, we expect Paragon not only to weather the storm but to have the financial strength and ability to seek investment opportunities in the year to come.”

The six credit facilities mentioned by Mr. Bodouroglou are listed below, along with the year-end amounts outstanding.  This table is derived from the company's 20-F Annual Report.



31 December 200731 December 2008
Commerzbank AG Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility $139,000,000 $110,310,000
Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG Secured Credit Facility 90,000,000 90,000,000
Bank of Scotland plc Secured Revolving Credit Facility 89,000,000 80,000,000
First Business Bank S.A. Secured Revolving Credit Facility
28,300,000
Bank of Ireland Secured Revolving Credit Facility
30,000,000
HSH Nordbank Credit Facility
48,875,000



Total $318,000,000 $387,485,000


A Form 6-K submitted on 7 April 2009 to the SEC included the following information about the status of Paragon's credit facilities:

As a result of the decline in the value of our vessels securing the six credit facilities that we are party to, as of December 31, 2008 we did not meet the security cover and certain of the financial covenants contained in those credit facilities. During the first quarter of 2009, we have amended four of our existing credit facilities, have entered into an agreement with the lender to amend our fifth credit facility and we have refinanced our sixth credit facility with a replacement credit facility with the same lender. The terms of the amendments that we have entered into or have agreed to enter into and our replacement credit facility waive our prior breaches of covenants relating to (i) security coverage ratios, (ii) market adjusted net worth requirements and (iii) indebtedness to total capitalization ratios or market value adjusted total assets as contained in the applicable credit facilities and temporarily suspend or amend such covenants. As of December 31, 2008, we had an aggregate of approximately $387.5 million of outstanding indebtedness, of which approximately $53.2 million was payable within 2009 after giving effect to the 2009 amendments and refinancing. Subsequent to the amendments and refinancing of our credit facilities, we may not draw any additional amounts under these facilities.

[emphasis added]


Just a week later, on 15 April 2009, Paragon submitted a Prospectus Supplement indicating an intention to offer up to 10 million shares through Cantor Fitzgerald

Results from the first quarter of 2009 (mentioned above) were released on 19 May.  By this date, more than 60 percent of the shares in this "Controlled Equity Offering" had been sold, according to the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Last week, on 5 June, Paragon filed a second Prospectus Supplement that signaled its intent to sell up to 10 million additional shares, again through Cantor Fitzgerald.  The company reported that the first offering had been completed and had brought the company approximately $42.6 million.

To put these offerings in perspective, readers should be aware Paragon had about 27 million shares outstanding on 31 December 2008.



Note:  InvestmentTools.com was the source of the  BDI chart.  Yahoo! Finance was the source of the share price chart.


Full disclosure: Long PRGN at time of writing

24 May 2009

PRGN: Financial Analysis through March 2009

Paragon Shipping, Inc., (NASDAQ: PRGN) earned $0.71 per share, up from $0.59, in the first quarter of 2009, which ended on 31 March.  The latest results were announced in this press release.  Typographical errors in the announcement were corrected in this 6-K/A.

This post provides an abbreviated GCFR analysis of the financial statements.  Paragon, which was established in late 2006 and went public in August 2007, is too new to determine meaningful gauge scores.  However, this post does list the financial metrics we would otherwise use to compute the scores.


First, we present some background information.

Paragon Shipping, Inc., owns and charters ships that carry dry bulk cargoes.  The company is officially registered in the Marshall Islands, but Voula, Greece, is where Paragon is headquartered.  It is important to note that Michael Bodouroglou, the Chairman and CEO,  also controls the company, Allseas Marine S.A., that manages Paragon's fleet.

The fleet now comprises 12 ships of three different types.  The twelfth vessel, the Friendly Seas, was purchased in August 2008 for $79.25 million.  Paragon generally charters its ships for extended periods -- one to five year "time charters" that have predictable revenues --  but the company can also enter into "spot charters" contracts for periods as short as a single voyage.

When  Paragon had its IPO, the company sold almost 11 million Class A common shares for $16 per share.  After expenses of $1.04 per share (is that high?), the sale brought in $164.5 million.  These funds, along with $318 million in debt assumed in 2007, have been used to build and expand the company's fleet.


In June 2008, Paragon's share price was over $21.  However, the ensuing collapse of the Baltic Dry Index of shipping rates caused the price of Paragon's share to tumble as low as $2.37 by November of that year.  In 2009, the shares have generally traded in a range between $3 and $6.  Last week, when the first quarter results were announced, the price bounced up to the higher end of the range.

Since Paragon had chartered its vessels under long-term contracts, the company's Revenue did not immediately follow the BDI's plunge.  However, as contracts expire, Paragon's charters will have to adjust to the lower market rates to keep its vessels active. 


While there are now over 700 ships idle off Singapore as consequence of the downturn in global trade, Paragon's strategy of long-term charters has prevented it from suffering this fate.  According to the press release,

" ... Paragon has 98% of its revenue days covered for 2009, 64% for 2010 and 39% for 2011 with some of the world's leading charterers."


It appears, not surprisingly, that lower rates have also reduced the value of the vessels themselves.  Well-capitalized shippers that believe the downturn is temporary could view the current period as an opportunity to expand their fleets.


Before we examine Paragon's financial metrics, we will review the latest quarterly Income Statement.  Unlike our practice with more established companies, we didn't make an earnings projection for the quarter. 

Paragon's financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  The currency is U.S. Dollars. 

The spreadsheet below displays Paragon's results in our normalized presentation.  Click here for a larger view of the spreadsheet.  Please note that the tabular format, which we use for all analyses, can and often does differ in material respects from company-used formats.  A common difference is the classification of income and expenses as Operating and Non-Operating. The standardization is simply for convenience and to facilitate cross-company comparisons.




Revenue (after commissions totaling 5.4 percent) in the March 2009 quarter was 1.6 percent greater than in the first quarter of 2008.  Positive revenue growth was achieved despite lower market rates because Paragon had one more ship operating in the latest period.  Revenue was down 7 percent from the immediately preceding December 2008 quarter.

The Cost of Goods Sold -- i.e., Voyage expenses + Vessel operating expenses + Dry-docking expenses -- was 13.7 percent of Revenue in the latest quarter, which translates into a Gross Margin of 86.3 percent.  In the year-earlier quarter, the margin was 89.0 percent. 

Dry-docking expenses fell from $112,500 to $39,700. 

Depreciation expenses were 21.7 percent of Revenue, up from 20.3 percent last year.  Paragon depreciates its vessels on a straight-line basis, assuming each has a useful life of 25 years from delivery.  The oldest ships in Paragon's fleet were built in 1995.
Sales, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses, in which we include related-party management fees, were 4.8 percent of Revenue.  These expenses were 5.3 percent of Revenue one year earlier.  Paragon states: 

We paid Allseas an average management fee of $783 per day per vessel during the three months ended March 31, 2009, and an amount of $50,000 that was charged by Allseas to us for legal, accounting and finance services that were provided throughout the period as per signed agreement date February 19, 2008.


Operating Income slipped 4.3 percent as higher operating cost and depreciation outweighed the small increase in Revenue and small decrease in SG&A.  Operating Income was, however, 1 percent greater than in the December 2008 quarter.

In the March 2008 quarter, Paragon recorded a $5.2 million loss on an interest rate swap, which is a financial mechanism that limits exposure to interest rate fluctuations.  The latest quarter also included a swap loss, but it was only $300,000.  The much-reduced swap loss helped slash non-operating expenses in half, and this savings enabled Net Income overcome the Operating Income decline and exceed last year's value by an eye-catching 22 percent.

Paragon paid no income taxes in either period.


Now for the metrics associated with our gauges.  As mentioned above, gauge scores are not provided because they would not be meaningful given Paragon's limited existence as a public company.

Cash ManagementMarch 20093 months prior12 months prior
Current Ratio0.91.02.9
LTD/Equity 99%109%105%
Debt/CFO 4.2 years4.6 years6.1 years
Inventory/CGS N/AN/AN/A
Finished Goods/Inventory N/AN/AN/A
Days of Sales Outstanding (DSO)3.2 days2.5 days1.4 days
Working Capital/Invested Capital -1.1%0.5%6.1%
Cash Conversion Cycle TimeN/AN/AN/A

Paragon raised cash in 2006 and 2007 by selling common shares to the public and with debt offerings.  The cash was used to purchase ships for transporting dry-bulk cargoes, and these ships were then chartered to other firms.  Each new ship put into service brings in Cash Flow from Operations that makes the debt level easier to bear.  The danger is that a sustained period of lower charter rates will depress Cash Flows, but the debt payments will still have to be made.

Paragon had $59 million in cash and cash equivalents on 31 March 2009.  This would cover the $53 million of long-term debt that has to be repaid or refinanced in 2009.  The company has $324 million of other long-term debt.


GrowthMarch 20093 months prior12 months prior
Revenue growth63.4%120%N/A
Revenue/Assets 21.7%21.7%14.8%
CFO growth 72.6%95.2%565%
Net Income growth 390%>1000%N/A
Growth rates are trailing four quarters compared to four previous quarters.

These sliding year-on-year growth rates look impressive, but it is important to note that Paragon was still in its start-up phase during the four quarters that ended in March 2008.  The company's capital structure and fleet size have been stable for the last couple of quarters, so it won't be long now before the growth rates provide a more realistic view of the company's performance.


ProfitabilityMarch 20093 months prior12 months prior
Operating Expenses/Revenue 42.1%41.2%67.1%
ROIC 8.7%15.1%5.8%
Free Cash Flow/Invested Capital 1.5%0.5%-56%
Accrual Ratio 14.3%8.6%49%

It's too early to say for sure, but the Operating Expense ratio seems to have a settled in an area that yields substantial Operating Income.

Because size of Paragon's fleet is still relatively small, and ships are expensive, each vessel purchased as an investment in the future represents a significant capital expenditure relative to present Cash Flow.  Each new vessel, therefore, temporarily depresses the Free Cash Flow ratio.  Should a year elapse without a new purchase, the FCF would increase substantially.

ValueMarch 20093 months prior12 months prior
P/E 1.31.927.3
P/E vs. S&P 500 P/E 8.3%9.8%155%
PEG0.00.00.0
Price/Revenue 0.60.84.1
Enterprise Value/Cash Flow (EV/CFO) 4.65.412.9


A Price to Earnings ratio under two, and an earnings growth rate so high the PEG is zero, will get any value investors attention.  However, for all the reasons described above, future earnings are not assured and recent growth rates are unlikely to be repeated.

Paragon's valuation ratios can be compared with other companies in the Shipping industry.


In the March 2009 quarter, Paragon's revenue increased slightly relative to 2008 because the fleet size had expanded.  Higher operating costs were, however, more significant, and Operating Income skidded 4.3 percent.  But, the more interesting difference between the two quarters was the earlier period had a $5.2 million loss on an interest rate swap.  In the recent period, this loss was only $300,000, which made the March 2009 quarter look better by $4.8 million.  Since Net Income was only $3.4 million higher, the effect of this non-operating item is obvious.

Paragon has $53 million of long-term debt that has to be repaid or refinanced in 2009. 

Since the first quarter ended, Paragon has sold through a "Controlled Equity Offering" more than 6.2 million common shares, at an average price of $3.65.  Given the good reception to the first quarter earnings announcement, which wasn't issued until 19 May 2009, it would be interesting to learn who was fortunate enough to buy the shares at a low price.


Note: Yahoo! Finance was the source for daily closing share prices. InvestmentTools.com was the source of the  BDI chart.

Full disclosure: Long PRGN at time of writing.

19 May 2009

PRGN: Earnings Announcement 2009-1Q

Paragon Shipping, Inc., (NASDAQ: PRGN) earned $0.71 per share in the first quarter of 2009, which ended on 31 March.  Paragon, which is engaged in the transportation of dry bulk cargoes, earned $0.59 per share in last year's first quarter. 

The results were reported in this press release.  Although we didn't project earnings for Paragon in this quarter, Reuters reported that Paragon's results "beat expectations" and caused the company's shares to soar in after-hours trading.

The spreadsheet below displays Paragon's results in our normalized presentation.  Link to a larger view of the spreadsheet here.  Please note that our arrangement of data may differ in material respects from the company's presentation.

We will post a thorough evaluation soon.




Full disclosure: Long PRGN at time of writing.

19 March 2009

PRGN: Financial Analysis through December 2008

Paragon Shipping (NASDAQ: PRGN) has announced its results for the fourth quarter of 2008 and for the full year.  

This post provides an abbreviated GCFR analysis of the financial statements.  Paragon, which was established in 2006, is too new to determine credible gauge scores, but we have calculated many of the financial metrics that drive our gauges.


Paragon Shipping, Inc., is a dry bulk cargo transporter officially registered in the Marshall Islands but with headquarters in Voula, Greece.  The company owns a fleet of 12 carriers of three different types for shipping dry goods in bulk.  The twelfth vessel, the Friendly Seas, was purchased on 5 August 2008 for $79.25 million.

Michael Bodouroglou, Paragon's CEO, is also the sole shareholder of Allseas Marine S.A., which manages Paragon's fleet.

The company went public in August 2007 when it sold almost 11 million Class A common shares in an IPO.  At $16 per share, less expenses of $1.04 per share, Paragon brought in $164.5 million.  These funds, along with $318 million in debt assumed in 2007, have been used to expand the company's fleet.

Paragon shares are now trading at a price below $4.00.  The plunge in value reflects the collapse, which began in June 2008, of the Baltic Dry Index of shipping rates.  Since Paragon had long-term contracts with the customers that had chartered its vessels, Paragon's Revenue has not followed the industry-wide falloff in rates.  However, when contracts expire, it appears now that Paragon will have to slash its charter rates to keep its vessels active. 

The downturn in global trade not only cuts shipping activity and shipping rates, it also reduces the value of the vessels themselves.  Shippers with sufficient financial resources (and a willingness to take a risk) can expand their fleets for low prices, relative to recent trends.

Before we examine the financial metrics associated with GCFR gauges, we will review the latest quarterly Income Statement.  Paragon's financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  The currency is U.S. Dollars. 

We didn't make any projections for the quarter.

Please note that the tabular format below, which we use for all analyses, can and often does differ in material respects from company-used formats. A common difference is the classification of income and expenses as Operating and Non-Operating. The standardization is simply for convenience and to facilitate cross-company comparisons.

http://sheet.zoho.com/public/ncarvin/prgn-income-statement?mode=html






Revenue in the fourth quarter was 2.1 percent more than in the third quarter, and it was 45.2 percent more than in fourth quarter of 2007.  Revenue in all of 2008 exceeded than Revenue in 2007 by 120 percent.  The average number of vessels in the Paragon's fleet rose from 7.2 in 2007 to 11.4 in 2008.
 
The Cost of Goods Sold -- i.e., Voyage expenses + Vessel operating expenses + Dry-docking expenses -- was 13.5 percent of Revenue in the latest quarter, which translates into a Gross Margin of 86.5 percent.  In the year-earlier quarter, the margin was 82.0 percent. 

Voyage expenses changed from a $225,000 expense in the fourth quarter of 2007 to a $13,000 credit in the fourth quarter of 2008.  Paragon defines Voyage expenses as "primarily ... port, canal and fuel costs that are unique to a particular voyage, as well as commissions."  It's not clear how these expenses could be below zero (i.e., a credit).

Depreciation increased in dollar terms from last year, but this expense dropped from 22.6 percent of Revenue in the December 2007 quarter to 20.7 percent in December 2008.

Sales, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses, in which we include related-party management fees, were 10.8 percent of Revenue.  These expenses were 16.6 percent of Revenue one year earlier.

Operating Income grew by 87 percent relative to the year-earlier quarter.  Operating Income was, however,  3 percent less than in the sequentially preceding quarter (September 2008).

Non-operating expenses soared 184 percent.  A significant proportion of this increase was due to a $8.8 million loss in the December 2008 quarter on an interest rate swap.  The loss on this swap was only $1 million in the fourth quarter of 2007.

Paragon paid no income taxes in either period.

Net Income was 28.5 percent greater than in the December 2007 quarter.


Cash ManagementDecember 2008
3 months prior
12 months prior
Current Ratio1.0
2.0
1.5
LTD/Equity
108%
119%112%
Debt/CFO
4.6 years
5.1 years
7.4 years
Inventory/CGS
N/A
N/AN/A
Finished Goods/Inventory
N/A
N/AN/A
Days of Sales Outstanding (DSO)2.5 days
1.5 days
3.8 days
Working Capital/Invested Capital 0.5%
5.3%
2.1%
Cash Conversion Cycle Time (CCCT)
-25 days
-32 days-27 days

Paragon raised cash by selling common shares to the public and with debt offerings.  The cash was used to acquire ships that were leased to firms transporting dry-bulk cargoes.  Each new ship put into service brings in Cash Flow from Operations that makes the debt level easier to bear.  The danger is that the pull back in global trade will reduce shipping levels to such an extent that no firms will want charter Paragon's ships when current leases expire, but the debt payments will still have to be made.

Paragon had $68 million in cash and cash equivalents when 2008 ended.  This would cover the $53 million of long-term debt that has to be repaid or refinanced (if such a thing is possible) in 2009.  The company has $334 million of other long-term debt.


GrowthDecember 20083 months prior
12 months prior
Revenue growth
120%
203%
N/A
Revenue/Assets
21.7%
19.8%
11.1%
CFO growth
95%
188%
N/A
Net Income growth
1300%
N/A
N/A

Note that the growth rates above for 2008 surpass the 58.8 percent increase from 2007 in the average number of vessels in Paragon's fleet.  We don't expect to see a growth rate that large in 2009, but it is possible Paragon will take advantage of the weak economy to buy ships at distressed prices.


ProfitabilityDecember 20083 months prior12 months prior
Operating Expenses/Revenue
41.2%
43.3%79.4%
ROIC 15.1%13.1%1.6%
FCF/Invested Capital
0.5%-28.6%-66.8%
Accrual Ratio
8.6%33.2%58.9%

Free Cash Flow is turned positive because Cash Flow from Operations was up significantly and capital expenditures to acquire vessels were down greatly.  The lower Accrual Ratio signifies a higher quality of earnings.


ValueDecember 20083 months prior12 months prior
P/E 1.9
3.598
P/E to S&P 500 average P/E 11%
19%550%
PEG 0.0
0.0
0.0
Price/Revenue 0.8
1.66.6
Enterprise Value/Cash Flow (EV/CFO)
5.4
7.317.9

Paragon's valuation ratios can be compared with other companies in the Shipping industry.  The metrics above seem to suggest that Paragon shares, which fell in price by 74 percent in 2008, are deeply undervalued.  The earnings growth rate is so high that the PEG is zero.

Despite the economy, 2009 could be OK for Paragon because its vessels are under contract for 98 percent of the possible days.  However, Paragon will have to enter in many new chartering arrangements in 2010 and 2011.  If these arrangements were made today, they would almost certainly be on terms that include much lower day rates. 

It was reassuring that Paragon's CEO stated that the companies that charter Paragon's ships "are meeting their contractual obligations."  One can easily imagine circumstances in which financially distressed customers seek relief from, or even walk away from, long-term contracts negotiated in times when rates were much higher.