14 August 2007

WMT: Financial Analysis through July 2007

We have analyzed Wal-Mart's (WMT) preliminary financial results for the quarter that ended on 31 July 2007. Our evaluation will be updated after the company formally submits a complete 10-Q report to the SEC.

Wal-Mart is the world's largest retailer. With annual sales of about $350 billion, Wal-Mart holds the number 2 spot on the Fortune 500 list of America's largest corporations. Wal-Mart's disruptive cost-cutting strategies have revolutionized the marketplace for better and for worse, depending on your point of view. Its visibility and role in advancing globalization have made Wal-Mart a lightning rod for criticism. Wal-Mart transformed retailing by using information technology to manage its supply chain and by pressuring manufacturers to squeeze every penny out of their costs. Rival discounters fell by the wayside, and manufacturers with higher costs suffered mightily. On the other hand, Wal-Mart's discounting is responsible for lower inflation (and thus interest rates), although this effect might not have been reflected fully in the published statistics.

When we analyzed Wal-Mart after the April quarter, the Overall score was 26 points. Of the four individual gauges that fed into this composite result, Value was the strongest at 11 points. Profitability was weakest at 2 points. [Note that recent algorithm tweaks led to minor changes in the previously reported scores.]

Now, with the available data from the July 2007 quarter, our gauges display the following scores:

Before we examine the factors that affected each gauge, let's compare the latest quarterly Income Statement to our previously announced expectations.


($ M)

July 2007
(actual)
July 2007
(predicted)
July 2006
(actual)
Revenue (1)

91990
92000
84524
Op expenses





CGS (70589)
(70840)
(64585)

SG&A (17130)
(17020) (15741)

Other
(0)
(0)
(0)
Operating Income (2)
4271
4140
4198
Other income





Investments
(106)
(100)
(91)

Interest, etc.
616
600
513
Pretax income

4781
4640
4620
Income tax

(1676)
(1601)
(1636)
Net Income
3105
3039
2984


$0.76/sh
0.74/sh
0.72/sh
Discontinued ops



(901)
1. Revenue for the July 2007 quarter was not a prediction.
2. The company includes some income in operating income that we treat as non-operating income.



Wal-Mart, in its most recent monthly sales report, previously reported that total net sales in the July 2007 quarter were approximately $92 billion. The exact number was $91.99. This figure is 8.8 percent above the sales in the July 2006 quarter, and it equates to year-over-year sales growth of 9.7 percent.

We thought the Cost of Goods Sold (CGS) would be 77 percent of Revenue, and the actual value was 76.7 percent. Sales, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses were 18.6 percent of Revenue, compared to our forecast of 18.5 percent.

Operating Income was 3.2 percent above the forecast value because of the slightly lower (as a percent of revenue) CGS.

Non-operating income was a trivial $10 million greater than expected. The Income Tax Rate was 35.1 percent, instead of the predicted 34.5 percent. As a result, Net Income exceeded our prediction by 2.2 percent.


Cash Management. This gauge increased from 4 points in April to 6 points now.

The measures that helped the gauge were:
  • Cash Conversion Cycle Time (CCCT) = 11.2 days, down from 12.9 days, for this measure of efficiency
  • LTD/Equity = 44.8%, up from 42.7 percent in July 2006, down from 49 percent three months ago
  • Inventory/CGS = 43.9 days, compared to 45.5 and 45.6 days 3 and 12 months ago, respectively
The measures that hurt the gauge were:

Growth. This gauge increased from 4 points in April to 9 points now.

The measures that helped the gauge were:
  • Revenue/Assets = 2.287, up from 2.26 in a year; sales efficiency is improving
The measures that hurt the gauge were:
The income tax rate was steady at 34.4 percent


Profitability. This gauge increased from 2 points in April to 3 points now.

The measures that helped the gauge were:
  • ROIC = 11.7 percent, down from 12.3 percent in a year
The measures that hurt the gauge were:

Value. Wal-Mart's stock price inched up over the quarter from $47.69 to $47.92. The Value gauge, based on the latter price, didn't change from 11 points three months ago (and 17 points twelve months ago).
  • Enterprise Value/Cash Flow = 11.4, down from 11.7 in July 2006, and much below a longer term median value over 14
  • P/E = 15, down from 16 a year ago, and (again) much below longer-term values
  • P/E to S&P 500 average P/E = 5 percent discount, lower than its five-year median of a 13 percent premium
  • Price/Revenue ratio = 0.5, lower than its five-year median of 0.7
The average P/E for the Retail - Department and Discount industry is currently a more expensive 16. The average Price/Revenue for the industry is currently 0.65.


Now at a so-so 30 out of 100 possible points, the Overall gauge rebounded a few points from April's below-the-zone 26 points. However, the increase is certainly not enough to cause any excitement. Wal-Mart needs to reverse the upward drift in its SG&A expenses and improve Cash Flow to stir any optimism. The recent earnings numbers were in-line with historic averages and previously reported data, which some analysts seem not to have considered.

12 August 2007

WMT: Reporting on Tuesday

On Tuesday, Wal-Mart (WMT) will report its earnings for the quarter that ended on 31 July 2007.

Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer, has been struggling. Competition, the economy, the low single digits. Target, which appeals to a somewhat more affluent customers, has been eroding Wal-Mart's market share from above. From below, high gas prices have taken a bite out of the wallets and pocketbooks of Wal-Mart's core customers. The company is responding by cutting back on plans to open new stores and by offering generic prescriptions drugs for $4.

We no longer have to rely on Wal-Mart's prediction of 1 to 2 percent sales growth in comparable stores to estimate the total Revenue in the quarter. The company, in its most recent monthly sales report, has already reported that total net sales for the quarter that ended July 31, 2007 were approximately $92 billion. This figure is 8.9 percent above the sales in the July 2006 quarter, and it equates to year-over-year sales growth of 9.7 percent. Using the monthly data, it appears that the sales growth in comparable stores was about 1.95 percent.

Wal-Mart's Gross Margin has been steady at 23 percent of revenue. We can, therefore, assume that the Cost of Goods Sold (CGS) in the July quarter was 77 percent of $92 billion, or $70.84 billion.

Wal-Mart's Sales, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses as a percent of revenue have been creeping up slowly. After a long stretch at around 18 percent, the climb has resumed. We will assume 18.5 percent. Thus, we're expecting SG&A expenses to be 18.5 percent of $92 billion, or $17.02 billion.

These assumptions would result in an Operating Income of $4.14 billion.

As for non-operating expenses, we'll extrapolate on recent trends and assume $600 million net interest and other income, and a $100 million deduction for minority interests. These values would bring pre-tax income to $4.64 billion.

Wal-Mart estimated that the average income tax rate for the current fiscal year will be between 34 and 35 percent. If we assume 34.5 percent, the provisions for income taxes will be $1.6 billion, and net income will be $3.04 billion ($0.74 per share).


($ M)

July 2007
(predicted)
July 2006
(actual)
Revenue

92000
84524
Op expenses




CGS (70840)
(64585)

SG&A (17020) (15741)

Other
(0)
(0)
Operating Income
4140
4198
Other income




Investments
(100)
(91)

Interest, etc.
600
513
Pretax income

4640
4620
Income tax

(1601)
(1636)
Net Income
3039
2984


0.74/sh
0.72/sh
Discontinued ops


(901)

10 August 2007

TDW: Financial Analysis through June 2007

We previously reviewed Tidewater's (TDW) quarterly Income Statement for the period that ended on 30 June 2007. The earlier review included a comparison of the actual income data with our expectations.

We were unable at that time to perform a complete financial analysis and compute gauge scores because the company hadn't yet made a Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Statement available for the quarter. This information gap has since been rectified, and we now have the full set of financial statements. Tidewater submitted these statements in a 10-Q report filed with the SEC.

This post reports on our evaluation of the data contained in the financial statements.


When we analyzed Tidewater after the March quarter, which was actually the fourth of their fiscal year, the Overall score was a very good 61 points. Of the four individual gauges that fed into this composite result, Growth was the strongest at 23 points. Profitability was weakest at 13 points. [Note that recent algorithm tweaks led to minor changes in the previously reported scores.]

Now, with the available data from the June 2007 quarter, our gauges display the following scores:

Cash Management. This gauge decreased from 17 points in March to 11 points now.

The measures that helped the gauge were:
  • LTD/Equity = 15.9%, compared to 18.3 percent a year ago
  • Debt/CFO = 0.7 years, compared to 0.7 and 0.8 years 3 and 12 months ago, respectively
  • Cash Conversion Cycle Time (CCCT) = 38 days, down from 52 days, for this measure of efficiency
  • Current Ratio =3.6; down to a more normal range, but still very much a sign of strength. Cash being spent on new vessels or stock repurchases is not putting the company in financial straps.

The measures that hurt the gauge were:

Growth. This gauge decreased from 23 points in March to 16 points.
  • Revenue growth = 21.5 percent, down from 32 percent in a year
  • Revenue/Assets = 42.9 percent, up from 40.7 percent in a year; sales efficiency is improving
  • Net Income growth = 34 percent, down from 137 percent in a year
  • CFO growth = 27 percent, down from 116 percent in a year
These growth measures are all commendable. They just happen to be down from last year, when growth was achieved from a smaller base. Net income benefited from a change in the income tax rate from 27 to 20 percent The tax rate decreased as a result of a continuing shift to more operations outside the U.S.


Profitability. This gauge decreased from 13 points in March to 7 points now.

The measures that helped the gauge were:
The decrease in operating expenses was primarily the result of an increase in Gross Margin.

The measures that hurt the gauge were:
  • FCF/Equity = 8 percent, down from 12 percent in a year (capital investments are eating into FCF)
  • Accrual Ratio = 8.2 percent, up from +4 percent in a year
The increasing Accrual Ratio tells us that less of the company's Net Income is due to CFO, and, therefore, more is due to changes in non-operational Balance Sheet accruals.


Value. Tidewater's stock price rose over the course of the quarter from $58.58 to $70.88. The Value gauge, based on the latter price, dropped to 13 points, compared to 15 points three months ago.

The measures that helped the gauge were:
The measures that hurt the gauge were:

The average P/E for the Oil Well Services and Equipment industry is currently a more expensive 18.6. The average Price/Revenue for the industry is currently 3.9.


Now at a moderate 45 out of 100 possible points, the Overall gauge has fallen from lofty levels in the 60s. We can attribute some of the drop to growth slowing from unsustainable levels, the higher stock price, and capital investing (beneficial in the long run, but it cuts into working capital and free cash flow).

08 August 2007

CSCO: Financial Analysis through July 2007

We have analyzed Cisco Systems' (CSCO) preliminary financial results for the fiscal year and quarter that ended on 31 July 2007. Our evaluation will be updated after the company formally submits a complete 10-K report to the SEC.

Cisco, the proud plumber of the Internet, has a commanding position in the market for enterprise-level networking devices. After acquiring Linksys and, more recently, Scientific Atlanta, Cisco now also sells devices intended for home use. Cisco shares began the fiscal year at $17.88 and ended July 2007 at $28.91. There was a short dalliance over $30.

When we analyzed Cisco after the April quarter, the Overall score was a fair, but improving, 38 points. Of the four individual gauges that fed into this composite result, Growth was the strongest at 24 points. Value was weakest at 2 points. [Note that recent algorithm tweaks led to minor changes in the previously reported scores.]

Now, with the available data from the July 2007 quarter, our gauges display the following scores:

Before we examine the factors that affected each gauge, let's compare the latest quarterly Income Statement to our previously announced expectations.

($M)

July 2007
(actual)
July 2007
(predicted)
July 2006
(actual)
Revenue
9433
9250 7984
Op expenses





CGS (3365)
(3284)
(2839)

R&D (1178)
(1203)
(1064)

SG&A (2404)
(2313)
(1911)

Other (183)
(150)
(180)
Operating Income
2303
2301 1990
Other income





Investments
0
0
0

Interest, etc.
228
200 156
Pretax income

2531
2501 2146
Income tax

(601)
(625)
(602)
Net Income
1930
1876 1544


$0.31
$0.30/sh
$0.25/sh






Revenue was 2 percent above the company's estimate, which we used. Revenue was 18.1 percent greater than in the year-earlier quarter, compared to the forecast 15.9 percent. In addition, we expected Cost of Goods Sold (CGS) to be 35.5 percent of Revenue, and the actual value was 35.7 percent. Research and Development (R&D) expenses were 12.5 percent of Revenue, a shade less than our 13 percent estimate. Sales, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses were 25.5 percent of Revenue, compared to our forecast of 25 percent.

The higher Revenue was offset by greater other operating costs, resulting in Operating Income almost exactly at the forecast value.

Non-operating income was $28 million more than expected. The Income Tax Rate was 23.75 percent, instead of the predicted 25 percent. As a result, Net Income exceeded our prediction by 2.9 percent.


Cash Management. This gauge decreased from 11 points in April to 9 points now.

The measures that helped the gauge were:
  • Current Ratio =2.4; a sign of strength, a little higher than last year's value
  • LTD/Equity = 20.4%; manageable and decreasing
  • Inventory/CGS = 39.0 days, compared to 39.4 and 50 days 3 and 12 months ago, respectively
  • Debt/CFO = 0.6 years, compared to 0.7 and 0.8 years 3 and 12 months ago, respectively
  • Cash Conversion Cycle Time (CCCT) = 52.9 days, down from 55.3 days, for this measure of efficiency
The measures that hurt the gauge were:

Note that the DSO change indicates the company is having less success getting its customers to pay their bills; rapid collection is a sign of efficiency because the payments received can be re-invested sooner.


Growth. This gauge decreased from 24 points in April to 15 points now.

The measures that helped the gauge were:

Net income benefited significantly from a change in the income tax rate from 26.9 to 22.5 percent

The measures that hurt the gauge were:

Profitability. This gauge decreased from 14 points in April to 12 points now.

The measures that helped the gauge were:
  • ROIC = 20.7 percent, up from 20.3 percent in a year
  • FCF/Equity = 28.1 percent, down from 29.8 percent in a year

The measures that hurt the gauge were:

The increasing Accrual Ratio tells us that less of the company's Net Income is due to CFO, and, therefore, more is due to changes in non-operational Balance Sheet accruals.


Value. Cisco's stock price rose over the course of the quarter from $26.74 to $28.91. The Value gauge, based on the latter price, dropped to 0 points from 2 points three months ago (and 13 points twelve months ago, when the price was much cheaper).

The measures that helped the gauge were:
  • Enterprise Value/Cash Flow = 16.4, up from a 15.6 median value and 12.6 in July 2006
  • P/E = 24.7, about the same as its 24.3 median, but up from 19.9 a year ago
  • P/E to S&P 500 average P/E = 47 percent premium, up from a median premium of 43 percent
  • Price/Revenue ratio = 5.2, compared to its median of 5.0

The average P/E for the Computer Peripherals industry is also about 24. The average Price/Revenue for the industry is currently 3.8.


By the most popular yardsticks, Cisco had an excellent quarter: Revenue, Cash Flow, and Net Income all increased sharply. But, our gauges aren't impressed. The Overall gauge is a mere 27 points. For one thing, the Growth gauge is the one that generally correlates least with stock price gains. One can argue that the Value gauge overreacted to small increases in each price measure, but it is signaling that the stock price is getting expensive.

07 August 2007

KG: Financial Analysis through June 2007

We have analyzed King Pharmaceuticals' (KG) preliminary financial results for the quarter that ended on 30 June 2007. Our evaluation will be updated after the company formally submits a complete 10-Q report to the SEC.


King Pharmaceuticals sells brand-name prescription pharmaceuticals, most notably Altace®. This ACE inhibitor, which is used to treat patients with cardiovascular risks, accounts for about 1/3 of King's net sales.

King experienced some difficulties in the early years of this decade, including Medicaid overcharge allegations, inventory management challenges, and a proposed merger with Mylan Labs that fell apart after Carl Icahn raised objections. King stock plunged 84 percent from $46.05 per share in July 2001 to $7.55 in April 2005, before rebounding to about $20. King has dealt with these problems. But, it now faces a challenge that could be more difficult to surmount: the looming loss of patent protection on Altace and other key products.

When we analyzed King after the March quarter, the Overall score was an excellent 59 points. Of the four individual gauges that fed into this composite result, Cash Management was the strongest at 19 points. Profitability and Value were weakest at 13 points each. [Note that recent algorithm tweaks led to minor changes in the previously reported scores.]


Now, with the available data from the June 2007 quarter, our gauges display the following scores:

Before we examine the factors that affected each gauge, let's compare the latest quarterly Income Statement to our previously announced expectations.


($ M)
June 2007
(actual)
June 2007
(predicted)
June 2006
(actual)
Revenue
543535 500
Op expenses




CGS (1) (126)(123) (107)

Depreciation (2)(40)(37)(39)

R&D (37)(37) (35)

SG&A (3) (173)(187) (154)

Other (4)(78)(20)(0)
Operating Income
88130 165
Other income




Investments 00 0

Interest, etc. 77 5
Pretax income
95137 170
Income tax
(30)(45) (59)
Net Income
6592 111


$0.27/sh0.37/sh 0.46/sh





1. Includes contract termination cost of $3.845 million.
2. Includes $1.5 million for "accelerated depreciation"
3. Includes co-promotion, legal, and professional fees.
4. Mostly asset impairment charges; also in-process R&D upon acquisition, restructuring charges



Revenue was 1.5 percent above our estimate. We expected Revenue to be 7 percent greater than in the year-earlier quarter, and the actual increase was 8.6 percent. In addition, we thought the Cost of Goods Sold (CGS) would be 23 percent of Revenue, and the actual value was 23.2 percent.

Depreciation was 7.4 percent of Revenue, compared to our estimate of 7 percent. Research and Development (R&D) expenses were 6.8 percent of Revenue, a shade less than our 7 percent estimate. Sales, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses were 31.9 percent of Revenue, compared to our forecast of 35 percent.

What through the quarter out of kilter was a $74.8 million asset impairment charge. The charge resulted from a decision to sell a manufacturing plant and to drop development of a new product formulation.

The net effect was Operating Income 32 percent below the forecast value.

The Income Tax Rate was 31.6 percent, instead of the predicted 33 percent. As a result, Net Income fell below our prediction by 29 percent.


Cash Management. This gauge decreased from 19 points in March to 17 points now.

The measures that helped the gauge were:

The measures that hurt the gauge were:

Finished Goods/Inventory was not reported, it was 28 and 31 percent 3 and 12 months ago, respectively


Growth. This gauge decreased from 16 points in March to 12 points now.

The measures that helped the gauge were:
Net income benefited from a change in the income tax rate from 34.7 to 31.4 percent

The measures that hurt the gauge were:

Profitability. This gauge increased from 13 points in March to 14 points now.

The measures that helped the gauge were:
  • FCF/Equity = 20.1 percent, up from 14.9 percent in a year
  • Accrual Ratio = -5.7 percent, down from -4.1 percent in a year
  • ROIC = 13.9 percent, down from 16.5 percent in a year
The decreasing Accrual Ratio tells us that more of the company's Net Income is due to CFO, and, therefore, less is due to changes in non-operational Balance Sheet accruals.

The measures that hurt the gauge were:

The increase in operating expenses was the result of a decrease in Gross Margin and an increase in special charges.


Value. King's stock price rose over the course of the quarter from $19.67 to $20.46. The Value gauge, based on the latter price, held steady at 13 points from three months ago.

The measures that helped the gauge were:
  • P/E = 16.3, about half its average
  • P/E to S&P 500 average P/E = 2 percent discount, much lower than its five-year median of a 60 percent premium
The measures that hurt the gauge were:

The average P/E for the Biotechnology and Drugs industry is 28. The average Price/Revenue for the industry is 8.


Now at very good 55 out of 100 possible points, the Overall gauge has been strong for eight of the last nine quarters. To some extent, the strength reflects a rebound from very tough conditions in previous years. We would feel much better about King if special operating charges weren't such a regular occurrence. We also have to worry about patent expirations.

06 August 2007

INTC: Financial Analysis through June 2007 (updated)

Intel's (INTC) preliminary financial results, reported in the form of press release, for the second quarter included only limited Cash Flow information. In our evaluation, we had to estimate Net Cash from Operations (CFO) from Net Income and other data.

The company subsequently submitted a Form 10-Q to the SEC with more complete financial statements. The 10-Q included the Cash Flow data missing in the original release.

We had estimated CFO at $2.728 billion for the quarter, and the correct figure was $2.417 billion. When we updated our analysis to use the lower CFO, the Profitability and Overall gauge scores were trimmed by one point each.

For completeness, we're providing the entire, updated analysis report.


Intel (INTC) manufactures integrated circuits for computers, servers, handheld devices, and communication products.

After a year in which Intel was the worst performer in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the stock price started a significant recovery in April 2007. Outpacing the broader market, investors decided that rosier times were ahead for Intel. Favorable reviews given to Intel's newest products led to predictions that Intel will regain market share from steadfast competitor Advanced Micro Devices (AMD).

When we analyzed Intel after the first quarter, the Overall score was a dismal 18 points, indicating we saw no premonitions of the subsequent turnaround. Of the four individual gauges that fed into this composite result, Cash Management was the strongest at 7 points. Growth was weakest at zero points. [Note that recent algorithm tweaks led to minor changes in the previously reported scores.]

Now, with the available data from the June 2007 quarter, our gauges display the following scores:

Before we examine each gauge, let's compare the latest Income Statement to our expectations.


($M)

2Q-2007
(actual)
2Q-2007
(predicted)
2Q-2006
(actual)
Revenue
8680
8500
8009
Op expenses





CGS (4605)
(4250)
(3838)

R&D (1353)
(1360)
(1496)

SG&A (1284)
(1360)
(1593)

Other (88)
(84)
(10)
Operating Income
1350
1446
1072
Other income





Investments
(1)
20
37

Interest, etc.
180
207
144
Pretax income

1529
1672
1253
Income tax

(251)
(518)
(368)
Net Income
1278
1154
885


0.22/sh
0.20/sh
0.15/sh






Revenue was 2 percent were higher than we expected, and 8 percent higher than the June 2007 quarter. We thought the Cost of Goods Sold (CGS) would be 50 percent of Revenue, and the actual value was 53 percent. In other words, the Gross Margin was 3 percent less than expected, mostly likely due to competitive pressures keeping prices in check. Research and Development (R&D) expenses were 15.6 percent of Revenue, a shade less than our 16 percent estimate. Sales, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses were 14.8 percent of Revenue, more than a point better than our forecast.

The higher CGS outweighed the better-than-expected Revenue, and the good control over R&D and SG&A expenses, resulting in lower-than-forecast Operating Income.

Non-operating income was $48 million less than expected. However, the Income Tax Rate was only 16.4 percent. Intel had predicted 31 percent. They now say that second quarter results benefited by $0.03/share for tax items, and they expect a tax rate going forward of 29 percent.

The low tax rate was the only reason that Net Income beat our prediction.


Cash Management. This gauge increased from 7 points in March to 10 points.

The measures that helped the gauge were:
The measures that hurt the gauge were:
Taken together, the two inventory ratios are worrisome.


Growth. This gauge increased from 0 points in March to 3 points.
  • Revenue growth = -3 percent, down from +1 percent
  • Revenue/Assets = 72 percent, down from 81 percent (efficiency suffering)
  • Net Income growth = -15 percent, awful but better than recent quarters, driven by tax rate
  • CFO growth = -7 percent, not as bad as last year's from -16 percent in a year

Profitability. This gauge increased from 5 points in March to 8 points now.

The measures that helped the gauge were:
The decreasing Accrual Ratio tells us that more of the company's Net Income is due to cash flow, and, therefore, less is due to changes in non-operational balance sheet accruals. This needs to be confirmed.

The measures that hurt the gauge were:
The big factor in the increase in operating expenses was the decrease in Gross Margin.


Value. Intel's stock price rose over the course of the quarter from $19.13 to $23.74. The Value gauge, based on the latter price, dropped to a weak 1 point, compared to 4 and 15 points three and twelve months ago, respectively.

There was no good news in the measures for this gauge.
  • Enterprise Value/CFO is 12.0, up from 9.1 in June 2006
  • P/E = 24.6, up from 16.7 hard to grow the multiple with so little growth
  • P/E to S&P 500 average P/E = 48 percent premium, about double the average
  • Price/Revenue ratio = 3.9, about the same as its long-term average.

The average P/E for the Semiconductor industry is a more expensive 28. The average Price/Sales for the Semiconductor industry is 5.2.


Now at a disappointing 20 out of 100 possible points, the Overall gauge stirred ever so slightly from last quarter.