The loss in the year-earlier quarter was primarily the result of Nokia writing off €900 million of intangible assets.
A previous article examined in some detail Nokia's Income Statement for the September quarter. Reported earnings doubled the €0.07 per share we had forecast.
We have now updated the various financial metrics we use to analyze Cash Management, Growth, Profitability and Value. This post reports on the metrics for Nokia and the associated financial gauge scores. The metrics were calculated using data from Nokia's current and historical financial statements.
We have now updated the various financial metrics we use to analyze Cash Management, Growth, Profitability and Value. This post reports on the metrics for Nokia and the associated financial gauge scores. The metrics were calculated using data from Nokia's current and historical financial statements.
Before getting into the details, we will take one step back to introduce the subject of today's analysis.
A Finnish company with a rich history, Nokia Corporation has been the leading global producer of mobile phones since 1998. The company also sells the network infrastructure that supports these phones.
Nokia's annual profit fell from €4.0 billion in 2008 to €891 million in 2009. Net Sales dropped from €50.7 billion in 2008 to €41.0 billion in 2009.
In the latest and most dramatic attempt to regain its competitive position, Nokia announced on 10 September 2010 that it would replace its Chief Executive Officer with Mr. Steven Elop, formerly of Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT).
Additional background information about Nokia and the business environment in which it is currently operating can be found in the look-ahead.
In summary, Nokia's latest quarterly results produced the following changes to the gauge scores:
- Cash Management: 19 of 25 (unchanged for June)
- Growth: 17 of 25 (up from 5)
- Profitability: 13 of 25 (up from 10)
- Value: 13 of 25 (unchanged)
- Overall: 58 of 100 (up from 49)
Cash Management | 30 Sep 2010 | 30 Jun 2010 | 30 Sep 2009 | 5-yr Avg |
Current Ratio | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
LTD to Equity | 28.5% | 27.7% | 32.0% | 9.6% |
Debt/CFO (years) | 1.5 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 0.8 |
Inventory/CGS (days) | 27.4 | 26.3 | 31.0 | 26.9 |
Finished Goods/Inventory | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Days of Sales Outstanding (days) | 67.7 | 71.3 | 80.8 | 63.3 |
Working Capital/Revenue | 19.6% | 18.6% | 12.7% | 17.8% |
Cash Conversion Cycle Time (days) | 29.8 | 31.4 | 39.0 | 30.6 |
Gauge Score (0 to 25) | 19 | 19 | 5 | 10 |
The changes in the Cash Management metrics were generally minor in the third quarter, resulting in a steady gauge score.
Nokia issued much more long-term debt in late 2008 and early 2009 that it had previously. However, the debt, now about €4.3 billion has not changed much over the last year. At less than 30 percent of shareholders' equity, the debt level does not seem excessive. The combination of long-term and short-term debt only amounts to about 18 months of the company's cash flow.
Nokia has made progress paring its inventory, when measured in terms of days of Cost of Good Sold. The inventory by this reckoning is about 10 percent leaner than last year, although it is one day greater than last quarter.
Significant drops from last year in the Days of Sales Outstanding and the related Cash Conversion Cycle Time both signal improved cash efficiency.
Growth | 30 Sep 2010 | 30 Jun 2010 | 30 Sep 2009 | 5-yr Avg |
Revenue Growth | 0.3% | -6.3% | -22.5% | 1.3% |
Revenue/Assets | 115.1% | 110.2% | 110.1% | 144.2% |
Operating Profit Growth | -44.6% | -32.0% | -3.4% | -21.0% |
CFO Growth | 174.1% | 110.1% | -77.3% | 19.9% |
Net Income Growth | 295.6% | -55.4% | -90.1% | 1.8% |
Gauge Score (0 to 25) | 17 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
The Operating Profit rate is the annualized rate of growth in Operating Profit after Taxes over the last 16 quarters.
The Growth gauge soared because the trailing-year Net Income and Cash Flow growth rates shot up.
The trailing-year Revenue growth rate turned positive, helped by 5 percent more Revenue in the September 2010 quarter than in the year-earlier period.
The Revenue/Assets ratio took a small, but welcome, step up after a lengthy decline. This reversal had an outsize effect on the Growth gauge score.
Profitability | 30 Sep 2010 | 30 Jun 2010 | 30 Sep 2009 | 5-yr Avg |
Operating Expense/Revenue | 94.6% | 94.2% | 95.7% | 90.3% |
ROIC | 15.0% | 4.0% | 8.7% | 58.1% |
Free Cash Flow/Invested Capital | 29.4% | 29.6% | 6.5% | 61.0% |
Accrual Ratio | 2.9% | -2.0% | 3.1% | 1.3% |
Gauge Score (0 to 25) | 13 | 10 | 4 | 12 |
We had earlier mentioned the substantial decline in the Return on Invested Capital, which had sagged under the weight of weak performance and special charges. The ROIC ratio has now taken a small step up, although it remains far below its previously lofty levels.
The Cash Flow figures have been more robust than earnings-driven results.
Value | 30 Sep 2010 | 30 Jun 2010 | 30 Sep 2009 | 5-yr Avg |
P/E | 18.1 | 31.3 | 104.4 | 23.9 |
P/E vs. S&P 500 P/E | 1.2 | 2.2 | 4.7 | 1.4 |
PEG | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2.0 |
Price/Sales | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.8 |
Enterprise Value/Cash Flow (EV/CFO) | 8.4 | 6.2 | 36.9 | 19.0 |
Gauge Score (0 to 25) | 13 | 13 | 7 | 8 |
Share Price ($) | $10.03 | $8.15 | $14.62 | - |
The Price/Sales and EV/CFO ratios are half or less than their long-term averages. This helps the Value gauge score considerably.
The earnings-related multiples, inflated by special charges, are starting to look more reasonable.
Overall | 30 Sep 2010 | 30 Jun 2010 | 30 Sep 2009 | 5-yr Avg |
Gauge Score (0 to 100) | 58 | 49 | 20 | 39 |
The long-suffering Growth gauge was the star of the third quarter, rising from 5 to 17 of the 25 possible points. This increase helped the Overall Gauge add nine points and approach attractive territory.
A key factor underlying the Growth gauge's resurgence was easier comparisons with results from 2009. Special charges have migrated from the recent four-quarter window to the one before. The test ahead will be whether the company can sustain the nascent momentum.
Full disclosure: Long NOK at time of writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment