02 August 2008

ADP: Financial Analysis through June 2008

We have analyzed ADP's preliminary financial results for the three months that ended on 30 June 2008, which was the fourth quarter of the company's fiscal 2008. For our purposes, the financial statements had two shortfalls: the Balance Sheet was abbreviated, and the Cash Flow Statement was omitted. These limitations are not unusual in an ADP preliminary report, and they will certainly be rectified in the 10-K the company will submit to the SEC. Since a GCFR evaluation requires some data that hasn't yet been made available, we have made some assumptions based on the historical record.

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) is a top provider to corporations of payroll and other personnel-related information technology services. ADP, which is one of a mere handful of U.S. companies with a AAA bond rating, publishes the monthly ADP National Employment Report (SM) on non-farm private employment. Last year, ADP divested its Brokerage Services Group business, which became Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR).

Our earlier analysis of ADP's March 2008 quarter determined that the GCFR Overall gauge score had risen to 56 points, which was the highest score we had computed for ADP in more than 4 years. The Cash Management, Growth, and Profitability, and Value gauges displayed double-digit scores on a scale of 0 to 25. The Overall score had been 52, of 100 possible, points after the December 2007 quarter.

Now, with the available data from the June 2008 quarter, our gauges display the following scores:

These scores are tentative because they were computed without needed Balance Sheet and Cash Flow data.

Before we examine the factors that affected each gauge, we will compare the latest quarterly Income Statement to our previously communicated expectations.

Please note that the tabular format below, which we use for all analyses, can and often does differ in material respects from company-used formats. A common difference is the classification of income and expenses as Operating and Non-Operating. The standardization is simply for convenience and to facilitate cross-company comparisons.

($ M)

June 2008
(actual)
June 2008
(predicted)
June 2007
(actual)
Revenue (1)

2207
2200
2000
Operating
expenses





CGS (2) (994)
(975)
(876)

Depreciation (3)
(61)
(59)
(55)

R&D (4) (141)
(134)
(130)

SG&A (697)
(660)
(649)

Other
(0)
0
(0)
Operating
Income

315
372
290
Other income





Investments
0
0
0

Interest, etc.
40
15
18
Pretax income

354
387
307
Income tax

(128)
(141)
(114)
Net Income from continuing operations

226
$0.435
246
$0.47/sh
194
$0.35/sh
Income from discontinued operations (5)

8
-
1
Shares used in per-share calculations

520
520
552
1. Total revenues includes interest on funds held for clients and Professional Employer Organization revenues.
2. Operating expenses
3. Depreciation and amortization.
4. System development and programming
5. Net of tax


Revenue in the quarter almost exactly matched our target, which was the mid-point of the guidance range identified in ADP's report on the third fiscal quarter. The actual number was 10.4 percent more than in the year-earlier period. Year-over-year Revenue Growth was 12.5 percent.

The Gross Margin of 55.0 percent in the June quarter was a little less than our 55.7 percent expectation. The realized margin translates into a Cost of Goods Sold (CGS) -- what ADP calls "Operating Expenses" -- of 45.0 percent of Revenue.

Depreciation was 2.7 percent of Revenue, which matched 2.7 percent forecast. Research and Development (R&D) expenses ("Systems Development and Programming Costs") were 6.4 percent of Revenue, which slightly exceeded our prediction of 6.1 percent.

More significantly, Sales, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses were 31.6 percent of Revenue. The amount by which these expenses surpassed our 30 percent estimate is wide enough to make us take notice.

Because the expenses were so much more than we anticipated, Operating Income lagged our forecast by 15.3 percent. Operating Income in the quarter was 8.6 percent greater than the amount attained in June 2007.

Non-operating income made up some of the operating shortfall, since it was $35 million above our target value. The Income Tax Rate in the recent quarter was 36.2 percent, compared to the predicted 36.5 percent.

Net Income from continuing operations, therefore, was only 8.1 percent below the predicted value. Net Income exceeded the level attained a year ago by 16.6 percent. The growth rate was even higher, about 24 percent, on a per-share basis because the company repurchased enough of its common stock to reduce the number of shares outstanding, on a diluted basis, by 5.8 percent.


Cash Management. This gauge decreased from 18 points in March to 8 points now. However, the recent score is suspect because we had to substitute estimates for missing Balance Sheet data.


June
2008
3 mos.
ago
12 mos.
ago
Current Ratio1.7
1.8
1.9
LTD/Equity
1.0%
1.0%0.8%
Debt/CFO
0.0 yrs
0.0 yrs
0.0 yrs
Inventory/CGS
N/A
N/AN/A
Finished Goods/Inventory
N/A
N/AN/A
Days of Sales Outstanding (DSO)46.7 days
44.6 days
42.3 days
Working Capital/Market Capitalization 6.2%
6.9%
5.9%
Cash Conversion Cycle Time (CCCT)
35.8 days
34.7 days
28.7 days

Debt is a non-factor for this AAA company, but cash management efficiency has slipped when judged by DSO and CCCT.


Growth. This gauge increased from 18 points in March to 20 points now.


June
2008
3 mos.
ago
12 mos.
ago
Revenue growth12.5%
13.3%
13.2%
Revenue/Assets 104%
97%
98%
CFO growth
22% (est.)
2.4%
-28.4%
Net Income growth 13.8%
16.6%
19.1%
Growth rates are trailing four quarters compared to four previous quarters.

Most of the Growth metrics improved, but there are hints of some deceleration in the last quarter. We anxiously await the Cash Flow statement to see whether it fit the pattern. Net income for the trailing four quarters benefited from a decrease in the effective income tax rate from 37.1 to 35.9 percent.


Profitability. This gauge didn't change from 15 points in March.


June
2008
3 mos.
ago
12 mos.
ago
Operating Expenses/Revenue 80.3%
80.1%80.7%
ROIC 31.1%
27.9%27.5%
FCF/Equity
27.8% (est)
23.8%21.9%
Accrual Ratio
-3.6% (est)
-3.8%-8.9%

Although fourth-quarter Operating Expenses were higher than we anticipated, on a trailing four quarters basis they were remarkably stable. The growth in ROIC is comforting. We don't have the Cash Flow data needed to determine the exact values for two of the key Profitability metrics.


Value. ADP's stock price slipped from $42.39 to $41.90 during the June quarter -- it has since reversed decline. The Value gauge, based on the quarter-end closing price, moved up from 13 to 15 points.


June
2008
3 mos.
ago
12 mos.
ago
P/E 18.7
19.6
26.2
P/E to S&P 500 average P/E 106%
114%160%
Price/Revenue 2.5
2.6
3.4
Enterprise Value/Cash Flow (EV/CFO)
12.8 (est)
13.819.2

ADP's valuation ratios can be compared with other companies in the Business Software and Services industry.

ADP shares have become less expensive by the metrics we follow most closesly.


If it holds up once we get the 10-K data, 56 out of 100 possible points for the Overall gauge is a relatively good score for ADP.

No comments:

Post a Comment